This Post is a Re-Post from my Old Blog…

I found Waldo… he is strangely alone…
Do you remember those pesky magic eye puzzles that were all the rage ten or fifteen years ago? About the same time as we were trying to find that stupid Waldo guy (who apparently liked to hang out in large crowds… I can relate) every single mall had a kiosk where they sold these stupid magic eye puzzles.
To the naked eye, it looked like a Jackson Pollock painting- a hodgepodge (love that word) of colors sort of splattered onto a poster. Apparently, if you stared at this thing long enough, crossed your eyes, stood on your head, and had a few drinks, the image would change and you would see a farm-scape or a sailboat, or Waldo, in 3D appear before your very eyes. It just so happened that the next kiosk over sold little bottles of Advil and eye drops, because not only did you have a headache from staring at these stupid posters, but your eyes dried out because you had to hold them open for so long trying to figure out if it was a monkey or a baseball bat that magically appeared out of the mixture of colors and textures. These stupid things were just as popular back then as hyper-color t-shirts. (Yea… remember those? If you touched them they changed color because of the heat in your hand. Until you washed them once. I am sure we were all poisoned by those shirts somehow. Maybe that is how we could see that magic eye puzzle- the hyper color t-shirts were making us hallucinate.)
I have to admit trying out these magic eye puzzles myself the first time. I walked by the kiosk and saw people just staring into the collection of various eye puzzles, and decided to join the herd. 3 hours later, I think I saw a camel in a space suit pop out in 3D.

It is the Mona Lisa… you see it don’t you?
There were always three types of people at these kiosks- the people that would walk up and look into the magic eye puzzle and instantly yell out (as if any of us cared) “I SEE IT!! IT IS A SUNSET IN TOKYO IN JUNE!” Others, grumbling, also loud enough for people to hear, “I just can’t see it, it is just a bunch of colors running together… I just can’t see it… are you sure that’s there?” The third type of person was the type that felt sorry for the second type of guy who couldn’t see the dolphin jumping out of a bowl of spaghettio’s and would help out assuring the incapable person- “It’ll be alright- just relax- let your eyes cross- don’t you see the dolphin? He’s right over there!”

This one is meaningless… they just made this one to mess with us.
I think that the most entertaining feature of the magic eye puzzle was not the magic eye puzzle itself, but watching the people stare for minutes at a time into what looked like a child’s finger painting.

I know the feelin’ buddy.
I did eventually see the images pop out of the posters, and it was neat, but I wonder if there was anything there at all, or if I was just buying into the hype of the magic eye puzzle. Maybe there was something there and maybe there wasn’t- was it my own perception, or was I borrowing the perception from my neighbor who gleefully “got it?”
Here is an interesting fact I heard recently- up to 90% (90%!!!!) of our perceptions are borrowed from other people.
I will let that sink in for just a minute.
It’s like Homer Simpson once said- 42% of statistics are made up on the spot, but only 12% of people know that. Sometimes we trust in the perceptions of others more than we know.

So when it comes to a world view- a cosmology as the philosophers like to coin it, a lot of our views come from what other people have told us. I think that is what Nietzsche was talking about when he was talking about his “will to power.” The will to power is the ability to impose our own perception onto the people around us. It works- just watch the news. They are imposing their views on us all the time, and I am even tempted to believe it simply because it is easier to believe them than to do the research on my own. I don’t have the time, the resources or the energy to do that.
Perception is a tricky thing. As I have mentioned in past posts, there are as many perceptions as there are people- if I am looking at this chair, and so are you, we may be seeing the chair differently- I may think it is red, and you may think it is violet. Perceptions, whether given or borrowed, are never 100% accurate. That is where communication comes in, in order that we may cut through what is mere opinion to the objective truth underneath. Life is constantly about that- it is a constant battle that I think a lot people really don’t engage in too well because it is a lot of work. Rather they would just rather accept the perceptions of others- culture, media, or what have you.

The rose colored glasses of opinion.
What is more important than the chair in our above example is not the chair necessarily, but our perception and our interpretation of the chair.
In a like manner, when we talk about theology, more specifically the Bible, it really isn’t the Bible that is important these days, but it is MY personal interpretation of the Bible that is important. You can really interpret the Bible in any way you want- a great example that I like to use is the whole slavery issue in the history of the United States- the abolishionists used the Bible to go against slavery, while the south used it to support slavery.
So when it comes down to it these days, what is more important than the Bible, or the Koran, or the Torah, or the Big Book in this culture, is our personal interpretation of the book- I can interpret those books to mean whatever I want them to mean- or whatever someone has told me to interpret them as. In order to interpret the Bible in the proper way we would need to go back to the original intention of the author (and the Spirit that inspired that author) and begin from there for a proper and true interpretation. Otherwise the snake handlers are just as justified to handle snakes as any of the mainstream religions.
It is a fine line between figuring out the truth and separating it from mere opinion or perception. As I said, this is probably the work of our lives, because the intellect seeks the truth. I do not think that there is a simple answer to this problem, as it goes back to the radical individualism of our modern western culture. Truth is out there though, it is simply not a matter of perception, but finding the truth requires us in some sense to question the perceptions that we have, the perceptions that others have, and to find the truth that underlies it all. That doesn’t mean that a generally accepted perception isn’t necessarily true, but we should deeply question EVERYTHING in our search for what is true and what is merely opinion.

There are two philosophers that come to mind here that I think would be important to mention. The first is Francis Bacon, and the other is Martin Heidegger. Both of these guys were advocates of what I am talking about- Bacon said that we have preconceived “idols” of the marketplace- accepted notions that were given to us by our upbringing and inculturation that we accept as truth. That doesn’t mean that they aren’t true, but that we need to toss them out every so often to test them to find which is true, and which is simply an “idol.” Heidegger on the other hand advocates a similar plan- that is to “step into the clearing of being,” in other words like a forest to step into a clearing that the sun (being) is unobscured by the trees of perception and opinion.

The “clearing” of being
Only when we step into the clearing of being, and get rid of the idols of the marketplace, can we begin to compare our own and others perceptions of things- including things like religious texts like the Bible, the the truth.
I remember my first day in philosophy class ten years ago- we studied… I think it was the Phaedo by Plato (I could be wrong on the title of that one)- the whole thing centered on the difference between mere opinion and truth. Its conclusion was that opinion can be true, but isn’t necessarily true, and it is our task- really our deepest desire- to separate opinion from what is objectively true. That’s about as hard sometimes as seeing those pecky pictures in the magic eye posters.
At the end of the day, finding truth is sort of like picking Waldo out of one of those “Where’s Waldo” pictures. There are a lot of things that LOOK like Waldo that are not, just like there are things that APPEAR true which are not. We can never be content with a look a like to the truth, just like we are not done with our search until we find Waldo, or see the 3D image in the magic eye poster.

Where’s Waldo? Where is the truth?